Legal Opinion
Jensen v. Kasik
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 19, 2008No. 24800PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
[¶ 1.] Kristen Jensen’s personal injury action was dismissed as beyond the applicable statute of limitations and she appeals. We reverse.
FACTS
[¶2.] On May 3, 2007, Jensen filed a civil complaint against Zachary Kasik seeking damages as the result of Kasik’s alleged negligent operation of a motor vehicle. The complaint alleged that on or about June 9, 2001, Kasik attempted to pass a vehicle in a no passing zone when it struck another vehicle. The second vehicle was driven by Mike Hadley and Jensen was a passenger in Hadley’s vehicle. After service by publication, Kasik answered the complaint…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State of Minn. Ex Rel. Hove v. DoeseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Stratmeyer v. StratmeyerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Shippen v. ParrottSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Loesch v. City of HuronSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. $1,010.00 IN AMERICAN CURRENCYSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Edgar v. MillsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Estate of Henderson v. Estate of HendersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Baye v. Diocese of Rapid CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Bernie v. Blue Cloud AbbeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Masloskie v. Century 21 American Real Estate, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.