Legal Opinion
Loesch v. City of Huron
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 25, 2006No. 23922PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEIERHENRY, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Collin Loesch (Loesch) brought suit against the City of Huron (City) after he was injured on a city street while riding his bicycle. The City brought a motion for judgment on the pleadings claiming that Loesch had failed to file suit within the two year statute of limitations in SDCL 9-24-5. Loesch claimed that SDCL 3-21-2, which requires an injured party to give notice to a city, and SDCL 3-21-6, which allows a city ninety days to respond, tolled the two year statute of limitations. The trial court ruled against Loesch and dismissed the lawsuit. The trial court…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Dillon v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Moss v. GuttormsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Dahn v. TrownsellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- California Cigarette Concessions, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Peterson, Ex Rel. Peterson v. BurnsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Fair v. Nash Finch Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- City of Rapid City v. EstesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Thach v. Tiger Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Slota v. ImhoffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Onnen v. Sioux Falls Independent School District 49-5South Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.