Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Shippen v. Parrott

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1993No. 17732PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Justice (on reassignment).

PROCEDURAL HISTORY/ISSUES

On January 3, 1989, Daniel Shippen (Ship-pen) commenced this action against Sherman Parrott (Parrott) advancing three claims: intentional sexual assault and battery, interference with Shippen’s contractual (marital) relationship, and intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED). Both parties waived trial by jury, and following a May, 1991 trial, the trial court rejected the interference with a contractual relationship claim. However, Shippen prevailed on the remaining claims and received compensatory damages for past and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of HobelsbergerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. United States v. Francis J. De SistoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  4. Lytle v. MorganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. FloodySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. S.V. v. R.V.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Farris v. ComptonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Green v. Siegel, Barnett & SchutzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Keegan v. First Bank of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Rehm v. LenzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API