Legal Opinion

Edgar v. Mills

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 2017No. 27891PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, Justice

[¶1.] In this breach of contract action, the circuit court found a lease agreement ambiguous and considered parol evidence. The court concluded that the parties intended the lease agreement to be a lease with an option to purchase. The court ordered specific performance, compelling the owners of the real estate to execute a warranty deed in favor of the lessees. The owners appeal. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

Background

[¶2.] In 2003, Thomas and Elizabeth Edgar entered into a written agreement with Boyd and Merlyn Mills concerning land in Faulk County, South Dakota, legally…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Alverson v. Northwestern National Casualty Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Ziegler Furniture & Funeral Home, Inc. v. CicmanecSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Discover Bank v. StanleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Hansen Housing, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Dowling Family Partnership v. Midland Farms, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wilbur-Ellis Company v. Kevin EriksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024
  2. Uhre Realty v. TronnesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  3. Primrose Retirement Communities, LLC and Gillette Retirement, LLC v. Ghidorzi Construction Company, LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2023
  4. State v. Quinones RodriguezSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Wilson v. MaynardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API