Legal Opinion

Estate of Henderson v. Estate of Henderson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 2012No. 26316PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Walter Henderson (Walter) brought a quiet title action to claim ownership of an undivided 30 percent interest in a mineral estate in Fall River County, South Dakota. Following a court trial, which confirmed Walter’s ownership of the mineral interest in fee, Walter’s half-sister, Susan Henderson (Susan), individually and as a representative of her deceased mother, Dora Henderson’s (Dora) estate, appeals to this Court arguing that Walter’s cause of action is barred by the statute of limitations under SDCL 15-2-13(1) and SDCL 15-3-2. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stockwell v. StockwellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Baltodano v. North Central Health Services, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Darling v. West River Masonry, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Clark v. DarlingtonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Selway Homeowners Ass'n v. CummingsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Eagle Ridge Estates Homeowners Ass'n v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Healy Ranch v. HealySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Healy v. OsborneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Koopman v. City of EdgemontSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Bingham Farms Trust v. City of Belle FourcheSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API