Stratmeyer v. Stratmeyer
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SABERS, Justice (on reassignment).
[¶ 1.] In this case, we reconsider whether the South Dakota Legislature intended SDCL 26-10-25 to apply to all acts of intentional sexual abuse or only to those acts of intentional sexual abuse which occurred after the effective date of the statute. Koenig v. Lambert, 527 N.W.2d 903 (S.D.1995), held that the Legislature did not intend for SDCL 26-10-25 to be retroactive. We now overrule Koenig and hold that the South Dakota Legislature intended the statute to apply to all acts of intentional sexual abuse of children. *221Therefore, we affirm the judgment of the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Isaac v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- City of Colton v. SchwebachSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Howell v. Spokane & Inland Empire Blood BankWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Morgan v. BaldwinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Schoenrock v. TappeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Strassburg v. Citizens State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Maffei v. Roman Catholic ArchbishopMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
- Peterson v. HohmSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Zephier v. Catholic Diocese of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Bruske v. HilleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.