Lucido v. Nestle Purina Petcare Co.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (2) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE THE EXPERT REPORT, OPINIONS, AND TESTIMONY OF DR. QUESTEN AND DR. TEGZES; AND (3) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD AND MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME
Edward M. Chen, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs have filed a class action against Defendant Nestle Purina Petcare *1101Co. (“Purina”) for “failftng] to disclose that Beneful dog food contains Industrial Grade Glycols, which are not approved for use in food, mycotoxins [a group of toxins produced by…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- BBK Tobacco & Foods LLP v. Central Coast Agriculture IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
- Benefit Cosmetics LLC v. E.L.F. Cosmetics, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Blue Bottle Coffee, LLC v. LiaoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
- City of Seattle v. Monsanto CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
- Classick v. Schell & Kampeter, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.