Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Monsanto Company

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided December 1, 2023No. 2:16-cv-00107Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 CITY OF SEATTLE, 9 Plaintiff, Case No. C16-107-RAJ-MLP 10 v. ORDER 11 MONSANTO COMPANY, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 This matter is before the Court on: (1) Plaintiff City of Seattle’s (“City”) “Motion to 16 Exclude Proposed Expert Testimony by Richard Pleus” (Pl.’s Pleus Mot. (dkt. # 607)) and 17 “Motion to Strike June 7, 2022 Supplement to the Expert Report of Dr. Richard C. Pleus” (Pl.’s 18 Pleus Strike Mot. (dkt. # 611)); (2) Defendants Monsanto Company, Solutia Inc., and Pharmacia 19…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  3. Joan Hangarter v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, and the Paul Revere Life Insurance Company Unumprovident Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. Primiano v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. Lavern Hankey, AKA Poo, OpinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API