Legal Opinion
Benefit Cosmetics LLC v. E.L.F. Cosmetics, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 25, 2024No. 3:23-cv-00861Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 BENEFIT COSMETICS LLC, 10 Case No. 23-cv-00861-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER ON MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE, 12 BENEFIT’S MOTION TO STRIKE, E.L.F. COSMETICS, INC., AND SEALING MOTIONS 13 Defendant. 14 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 In this trademark and trade dress infringement case, Plaintiff Benefit Cosmetics LLC 17 (“Benefit”) avers Defendant e.l.f. Cosmetics, Inc. (“e.l.f.”) infringed on intellectual property 18 associated with Benefit’s Roller Lash mascara. Benefit and e.l.f. have filed cross-motions to 19 exclude various expert…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Joan Hangarter v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, and the Paul Revere Life Insurance Company Unumprovident Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Alaska Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Avis Budget Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.