Legal Opinion

Classick v. Schell & Kampeter, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 19, 2021No. 2:18-cv-02344Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 RICHARD DAVID CLASSICK, JR., No. 2:18-cv-02344-JAM-AC individually and on behalf of 9 all others similarly situated, 10 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION Plaintiff, TO DISMISS 11 v. 12 SCHELL & KAMPETER, INC. d/b/a 13 DIAMOND PET FOODS, 14 Defendant. 15 16 Richard David Classick, Jr. (“Plaintiff”), the owner of a 17 Blue Nose American Pitbull named Otis, purchased Taste of the 18 Wild® dog food for his loyal companion until he discovered it 19 contains undisclosed levels of heavy metals, BPA, pesticides, 20 acrylamides…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Karim Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Williams v. Gerber Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Newcal Industries, Inc. v. IKON Office SolutionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API