Rodrigues v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUSHING, P. J.
Introduction
Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (b), 1 requires the trial court in a civil action to grant relief from default when the defaulting party’s attorney files an affidavit attesting that the default was the product of his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or neglect. The question now before us is whether an affidavit so attesting entitles the defaulting party to mandatory relief if it is executed by an attorney not licensed to practice in California, but licensed in another jurisdiction. We have concluded that granting relief in such…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Vons Companies, Inc. v. Seabest Foods, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
- Kopp v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Watts v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Zamora v. Clayborn Contracting Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Leader v. Health Industries of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jsm Tuscany, LLC v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Ross v. KishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Interinsurance Exchange of Automobile Club v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- SJP Limited Partnership v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Standard Microsystems Corp. v. Winbond Electronics Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.