Vons Companies, Inc. v. Seabest Foods, Inc.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GEORGE, C. J.
We consider in this case the issue whether California courts may exercise personal jurisdiction over owners of “fast food” restaurant franchises located in another state, in litigation stemming from several incidents of food poisoning that occurred in the foreign jurisdiction. We conclude that the franchisees had sufficient contacts with California through their relationship with their California franchiser, and that the tort claims alleged against the franchisees in a cross-complaint filed in a California action stemming from the food poisoning incidents were sufficiently…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by313 opinions
- O'CONNOR v. Sandy Lane Hotel Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Moki Mac River Expeditions v. DruggTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- Licci Ex Rel. Licci v. Lebanese Canadian Bank, SALCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Sonora Diamond Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- 3D Systems, Inc. v. Aarotech Laboratories, Inc., Aaroflex, Inc. And Albert C. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
308 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.