Legal Opinion
Jsm Tuscany, LLC v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 29, 2011No. B227360PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, Acting P. J.
In these writ proceedings, we consider the trial court’s denial, without prejudice, of petitioners’1 motion to compel arbitration *1226pursuant to the provisions of three separate, but substantially identical, real estate purchase contracts. Petitioners are 12 of the 27 defendants named in the first amended complaint (the operative pleading before us) filed by the four plaintiffs, N. Neil Shekhter; NMS Properties, Inc.; 15394 NM, LLC; and NMS/JSM San Lorenzo, LLC.2
Plaintiffs’ complaint, although pleading some 16 causes of action, essentially seeks recovery of damages…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Powers v. City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Goldman v. KPMG, LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Norcal Mutual Insurance Company v. NewtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Metalclad Corp. v. Ventana Environmental Organizational PartnershipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Molecular Analytical Systems v. Ciphergen Biosystems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Jessica Kramer v. Toyota Motor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Auto Parts Manufacturing Mississippi, Inc. v. King Construction of Houston, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- Jones v. JacobsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- DMS Services, LLC v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Cohen v. TNP 2008 Participating Notes Program, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.