Legal Opinion

SJP Limited Partnership v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 7, 2006No. B180220PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DOI TODD, J.

The question presented is whether an affidavit of fault signed by an attorney who represents a party in a bankruptcy proceeding but not in the civil action is competent to support a party’s motion in the civil action for mandatory relief under Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 473, subdivision (b). We hold that such an affidavit is competent and reverse the judgment of dismissal as to that party. We otherwise affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Appellants SJP Limited Partnership (SJP) and its general partner, George Justice (Justice), sued the City of Los Angeles and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Burden v. SnowdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Leader v. Health Industries of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Peltier v. McCloud River RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. English v. Ikon Business Solutions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Cisneros v. VueveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Wallace v. McCubbinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Huh v. WangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Carmel, Ltd. v. TavoussiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. McClain v. Kissler, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  5. Martin Potts & Associates, Inc. v. Corsair, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API