Legal Opinion
Zamora v. Clayborn Contracting Group, Inc.
California Supreme Court
Decided June 17, 2002No. S100352PublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
121 Cal.Rptr.2d 187 (2002)
28 Cal.4th 249
47 P.3d 1056
Pablo ZAMORA, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
CLAYBORN CONTRACTING GROUP, INC., Defendant and Appellant.
No. S100352.
Supreme Court of California.
June 17, 2002.
Weintraub Genshlea Chediak Sproul, Charles L. Post, Thomas G. Trost and Thadd A. Blizzard, Sacramento, for Defendant and Appellant.
Glen E. Gates for Plaintiff and Respondent.
BROWN, J.
This appeal arises out of a typo. In typing up an offer to compromise pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 998[1] (section 998 offer), an attorney's legal assistant types the word "against" instead of the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Wilcox v. BirtwhistleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Folsom v. Butte County Assn. of GovernmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Griffith Co. v. San Diego College for WomenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Donovan v. RRL Corp.California Supreme Court · 2001
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Kougasian v. TMSL, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Kougasian v. Tmsl, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Even Zohar Construction & Remodeling, Inc. v. Bellaire Townhouses, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Maynard v. BrandonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Toho-Towa Co. v. Morgan Creek Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.