Legal Opinion
In Re Beatty
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided December 11, 1974No. 104PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Justice.
The sole question presented by this appeal is whether claimants, by adhering to the contractual obligations of the Guaranteed Annual Income agreement, met the availability requirement of G.S. 96-13 (3).
G.S. 96-13(3), in relevant part, provides:
“An unemployed individual shall be eligible to receive benefits with respect to any week only if the Commission finds that—(3) He is . . . available for work. . . .”
The phrase “available for work” is not susceptible of precise definition, and whether a person is available for work differs according to the facts of each individual case.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Mattey v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- State Ex Rel. Unemployment Compensation Commission v. BarberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Bigger v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of Delaware · 1947
- Chambers v. Owens-Ames-Kimball Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. FulcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Watkins v. North Carolina State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- N.C. Acupuncture Licensing Bd. v. N.C. Bd. of Physical Therapy ExaminersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
- Dorsey v. Department of Workforce ServicesUtah Supreme Court · 2014
- Arkansas Oklahoma Gas Corp. v. Director, Arkansas Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.