Legal Opinion
Chambers v. Owens-Ames-Kimball Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 22, 1946No. 30617PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The appellee refused to accept the referral of the bureau to a nonunion employment because, as he claims, .working therein would have resulted in a violation of the rules of his union and might have subjected him to disciplinary action by the union.
The validity of his excuse for refusal to accept new employment, as it affects his right to receive unemployment compensation, depends upon his fitness for the work made available to him. In turn, his fitness for employment was specifically fixed by the Ohio Unemployment Compensation Act.
Section 1345-6 a (4) (5), General Code (119 Ohio Laws, 836),…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdorySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Ex Parte EndoSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hertz v. WoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Patapsco Guano Co. v. North Carolina Board of AgricultureSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Knights Templars' & Masons' Life Indemnity Co. v. JarmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Barclay White Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- State v. EarlenbaughOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Bigger v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of Delaware · 1947
- Schneider v. LaffoonOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- Lyons v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.