Legal Opinion

In Re Watson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 8, 1968No. 438PublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaee, J.

The sole question for determination on this appeal is this: When the mother of a nine year old child is laid off from her job on the first shift, without fault on her part, and is thereafter tendered like work on the second shift, which she refuses solely for the reason that she is unable to obtain adequate care and supervision for her child during the work hours of the second shift, is she disqualified for unemployment insurance benefits? We conclude that the answer is, No.

The public policy of this State which gave rise to the Employment Security Act is thus declared in G.S. 96-2:

“As a guide…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. State Highway Commission v. HemphillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Unemployment Compensation Commission v. TomkoSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
  5. Swanson v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. State v. HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Matter of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Stevenson v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Sutton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Schofield v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API