Legal Opinion

Watkins v. North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 2, 2004No. 301A03PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

Petitioner, Paul E. Watkins, is a dentist licensed to practice dentistry in North Carolina who limits his practice in this state 1 to the specialty area of orthodontics. Based on formal complaints initiated by three of petitioner’s patients — John Casto, Conrad Naico, and Sabrina Wolfe — the North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners (Dental Board or the Board) held an administrative hearing to determine if petitioner had violated applicable provisions of the Dental Practice Act, N.C.G.S. § 90-22 to 90-48.3 (2003). The evidence presented at the hearing included documentary…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Wake County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate BureauSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Mann Media, Inc. v. Randolph County Planning BoardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Stevenson v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Arthurs v. Board of Registration in MedicineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources v. CarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Hilliard v. North Carolina Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. In re JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  4. Meza v. Division of Social ServicesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
  5. Total Renal Care of North Carolina, LLC v. North Carolina Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API