Legal Opinion

Mattey v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1948No. Appeal, 3PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, P. J.,

TMs appeal in an unemployment compensation case raises tbe question whether claimant, who was on vacation without pay, is entitled to benefits for that period. The facts are undisputed.

Claimant, prior to February 19, 1946, had been employed by the Stegmaier Brewing Company, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania. He became unemployed after that date, and on March 11, 1947, he filed an application for unemployment compensation benefits, and received several weekly benefit payments during March and April of 1947. On April 18, 1947, he started his employment with the Glen Alden Coal…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Barclay White Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Brilhart Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Hassey v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Prentice v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Moen v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  2. Department of Labor & Industry v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Jackson v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  4. I. M. Dach Underwear Co. v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  5. California Portland Cement Co. v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API