Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Unemployment Compensation Commission v. Barber
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided May 31, 1941PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.
Upon investigation, conducted in accordance with the procedure prescribed by the Unemployment Compensation statute, and from the testimony thereby obtained, it was found as a fact by the Unemployment Compensation Commission that defendant J. M. Willis was proprietor of three employing units, “J. M. Willis Barber & Beauty Shop, 124 Burke Street,” “J. M. Willis Barber & Beauty Shop, 114 Reynolds Building,” and “Reynolds Building Barber Shop,” all in the city of Winston-Salem, and that in these places, where the business indicated was carried on under the ownership or control of the defendant,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Steward MacHine Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Maxwell v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- In Re the Eligibility of the Persons Employed at the St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Tamarin Lindenberg v. Jackson Nat'l Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- New Haven Metal & Heating Supply Co. v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Cheung v. Eighth Judicial District Court of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2005
- Zehender & Factor, Inc. v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
- Belk's Department Store, Inc. v. . Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.