Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 4, 2008No. Misc. Docket AG No. 14, Sept. Term, 2007PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRaker, J.

The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland filed a petition with this Court for disciplinary action against Michael F. Taylor, alleging violations of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct. The Commission charged respondent with violating (1) Md. Rule 16-607 Commingling of Funds, 1 as well as the following Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct: (2) Rule 1.15 Safekeeping Property, 2 (3) Rule 8.1 Bar Admission and Disciplinary Matters, 3 (4) Rule 8.4 Misconduct, 4 (5) Rule 1.3 Diligence, 5 (6) Rule 1.4 Communication, 6 (7) Rule 1.5 Fees, 7 (8) Rule 3.2 Expediting Litigation, 8…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. FezellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ReinhardtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BakasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. DoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. De La PazCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. FoltzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API