Legal Opinion

State v. Jolin

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 4, 1994PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATHEN, Chief Justice.

Defendant Robert Jolin was convicted in the District Court (Bangor, Russell, /.) of operating a motor vehicle under the influence of intoxicating liquor. 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312 (1993). On appeal he contends that the evidence obtained by the arresting officer should have been suppressed because the officer exceeded her territorial authority under the so-called fresh pursuit statute. 30-A M.R.S.A § 2671(2) (Supp.1992). 1 We decline to adopt a 'per se rule that would require the exclusion of evidence obtained in connection with an extraterritorial arrest. On the facts of this…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. City of Kettering v. HollenOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. People v. WolfSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  5. People v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. McKayCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Hsu-Nan HuangSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  3. State v. PikeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  4. State of Maine v. Ryan TurnerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  5. State v. RideoutSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API