State v. Jolin
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
WATHEN, Chief Justice.
Defendant Robert Jolin was convicted in the District Court (Bangor, Russell, /.) of operating a motor vehicle under the influence of intoxicating liquor. 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312 (1993). On appeal he contends that the evidence obtained by the arresting officer should have been suppressed because the officer exceeded her territorial authority under the so-called fresh pursuit statute. 30-A M.R.S.A § 2671(2) (Supp.1992). 1 We decline to adopt a 'per se rule that would require the exclusion of evidence obtained in connection with an extraterritorial arrest. On the facts of this…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- City of Kettering v. HollenOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. WolfSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- People v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. McKayCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Hsu-Nan HuangSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- State v. PikeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- State of Maine v. Ryan TurnerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
- State v. RideoutSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.