Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Hsu-Nan Huang

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 26, 1995No. 83, 1994, 89, 1994PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, Justice:

This is an interlocutory appeal from the Superior Court. The plaintiff-appellee, Hsu-Nan Huang, guardian ad litem for Stephanie Huang (“Huang”), a minor, seeks damages from the defendants-appellants, Sears, Roebuck & Co. (“Sears”) and Otis Elevator Co. (“Otis”). Huang’s suit is based on the alleged negligence of Sears and Otis, with regard to an incident in which Huang’s hand became caught in an escalator.

This appeal arises from the Superior Court’s ruling, which granted Huang’s motion in limine, to preclude reference at trial to the alleged negligent conduct of Huang’s…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Culver v. BennettSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  2. Chudnofsky v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  3. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1976
  4. Sweetman v. Strescon Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1978
  5. Fields v. Synthetic Ropes, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Duphily v. Delaware Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  2. Crotta v. Home Depot, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  3. Woolard v. JLG Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  4. Spence v. Cherian v. SpenceSuperior Court of Delaware · 2016
  5. General Motors Corp. v. WolharSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API