City of Kettering v. Hollen
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDowd, J.
As a general proposition, an extraterritorial arrest by a municipal police officer for an alleged misdemeanor is not authorized under existing Ohio law.1 In this case, the ap*234pellant contends that the arrest is authorized because the arresting process commenced while the defendant and the officer were still within the officer’s municipality, i.e., the city of Kettering. The appellant contends alternatively that, assuming, arguendo, the unlawfulness of the arrest, the sanction of exclusion does not apply with respect to the officer’s testimony regarding the defendant’s actions after the arrest…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Michigan v. DeFillippoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. DownsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. MyersOhio Supreme Court · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- State v. IssaOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. UngerOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. FrenchOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. WilmothOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 2000
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.