Legal Opinion
People v. McKay
California Supreme Court
Decided March 4, 2002No. S091421PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAXTER, J.
California has, in various statutes, limited the circumstances in which a peace officer may effect a custodial arrest for minor offenses. (E.g., Pen. Code, §§ 818, 827.1, 853.5, 853.6; Pub. Resources Code, § 5786.17; Veh. Code, §§ 40302, 40302.5, 40303, 40303.5, 40304, 40305, 40305.5.) California also has, by the passage of Proposition 8 in 1982, limited the circumstances in which a trial court may exclude relevant evidence as a sanction for the violation of these state statutes. (Cal. Const., art. I, § 28, subd. (d).) As we have previously observed, state statutes limiting…
2Cases cited84 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Edgerly v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- People v. ReddCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Pineda v. Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2011
- Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Carlos Flores-Lopez v. Eric H. Holder Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.