People v. Wolf
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSON, Justice.
Pursuant to C.A.R. 4.1, the district attorney has prosecuted an interlocutory appeal from an order suppressing evidence seized incident to the defendant’s arrest. At issue is the legality of an arrest made outside the jurisdictional boundaries of the Denver police. We reverse the district court and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Based on a tip from an informant that the defendant, Morris Wolf, was purchasing stolen merchandise, the Denver Police Department Anti-Fencing Unit initiated an *215investigation. The defendant’s place of business, Adam Loan,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- State v. BondsWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. ThiretSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- People v. FreemanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- People v. McKayCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. DylaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.