People v. Hamilton
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
KIRSHBAUM, Justice.
The People have filed this interlocutory appeal pursuant to C.A.R. 4.1 seeking reversal of the trial court’s order suppressing items seized incident to defendant’s arrest. The order was based on the trial court’s conclusion that in executing an arrest warrant Golden Police Department officers had no authority to arrest defendant in the City and County of Denver. While we agree that the officers had no such authority, we reverse the suppression order under the circumstances of this case.
The pertinent facts are undisputed. During the early evening of July 19,1982, Golden…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. CaceresSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Bridges v. WixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. Ruby Davidson Walden and William Luther WaldenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
- People v. WolfSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- People v. ThiretSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Colorado General Assembly v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- People v. DylaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. LowSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 2015
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.