Legal Opinion

Smith v. Saulsberry

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1930No. 22187. Department OnePublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

This suit, brought to recover on two causes of action, for legal services rendered by the plaintiffs to the defendant, was tried to a jury. A verdict was returned in favor of the plaintiffs for the amount claimed to be due on each cause of action. Motion for a new trial was overruled. From judgment entered on the verdict, the defendant has appealed.

The facts upon which respondents rely to recover on the first cause of action are as follows: The appellant retained the respondents to represent him in an action instituted by one Miller against the appellant and one other for the specific…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mecham v. McKayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Mulvey v. GibbonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Valley Planting Co. v. WiseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  4. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  5. Keller v. MortonNew York Supreme Court · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. SchwerinArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Kennedy v. ClausingWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Rushlight v. MacLainWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Dodge v. StencilWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Weaver v. General Metals MergerWashington Supreme Court · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API