Dodge v. Stencil
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
The trial court sustained a challenge to the sufficiency of plaintiff’s evidence upon the ground that there was not “substantial evidence to let this case go to the jury.” The court dismissed the action with prejudice and denied a motion for a new trial. Plaintiff, individually and as guardian ad litem of his minor daughter, Lynne, appeals.
The material facts and all reasonable inferences therefrom, which we accept as true (Ross v. Northern Pac. R. Co., 46 Wn. (2d) 832, 833, 285 P. (2d) 870 (1955)), are these:
Lynne Dodge, three and one half years old at the time of the accident, lived with her…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Meyer v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Lamoreaux v. FosketWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- Evans v. Yakima Valley Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1952
- Kennett v. FedericiWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Smith v. SaulsberryWashington Supreme Court · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Beaulieu v. ElliottAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
- Thurston County v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Thurston County v. W. WASH. GROWTH MANAGEMENTWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Convention Center Coalition v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Hogenson v. Service Armament Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.