Legal Opinion

Keller v. Morton

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1909PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment entered upon the verdict of a jury in favor of the plaintiff and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of ¡New York, seventh district, borough of Manhattan.

1Opinion of the CourtSeabury, J.

The plaintiffs, who employed the defendant as a salesman, brought this action to recover money alleged to have been advanced to the defendant in excess of eommis*341sions earned. The plaintiffs’ right to recover depended upon the terms of the contract under which they employed the defendant. The case was tried upon the issues raised by the answer to the amended complaint. A demurrer to the original complaint, on the ground that it failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, had previously been sustained and the plaintiffs given leave to serve an amended complaint.

Upon the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. SaulsberryWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Rifkind v. Web IV Music, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Goldberg v. SeidmanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API