Legal Opinion

Rushlight v. MacLain

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1947No. 30028PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbel, J.

Plaintiff brought suit on three negotiable promissory notes, payable on demand, executed by defendant in Seattle, where defendant was then a resident. The first two notes were executed in 1937, and the last note on February 7, 1938. The first and second notes were payable to plaintiff, and the last note was payable to A. G. Rush-light & Company, a corporation, of which plaintiff was president. Plaintiff had endorsed the first two notes over to this company; however, all of the notes were endorsed to plaintiff for collection just prior to the time this suit was brought.

The notes grew out of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SchendelSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Cannavina v. PostonWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Mulvey v. GibbonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Bain v. WallaceWashington Supreme Court · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rivas v. Overlake Hosp. Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Cost Management Services, Inc. v. City of LakewoodWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  3. King v. ClodfelterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  4. Witzel v. TenaWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Guy F. Atkinson Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API