Legal Opinion

Kennedy v. Clausing

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1968No. 38394PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunter, J.

This is an appeal from a jury verdict and judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff (respondent), an attorney, in an action to recover legal fees from the defendant V. D. Clausing, an osteopathic physician, and his marital community (appellants), who will be referred to as the doctor or the defendant.

The plaintiff predicated his claims upon two verbal contingent fee contracts entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant during the course of their attorney-client relationship. Alternatively, the plaintiff sought judgment for the reasonable value of his services. The doctor admitted…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. In re the Estate of SchanzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  3. In re Estate of SchanzerNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. Fein v. SchwartzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Rupp v. CoolSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Carle v. McChord Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  2. McLaughlin v. CookeWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Nelson v. MuellerWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Ward v. Richards & Rossano, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  5. Johnson v. TindallMontana Supreme Court · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API