In Re Senty-Haugen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
583 N.W.2d 266 (1998)
In re Arthur Dale SENTY-HAUGEN.
No. C9-96-1095.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
August 20, 1998.
Rehearing Denied September 17, 1998.
Steven R. Kufus, St. Paul, for appellant.
Susan Gaertner, Ramsey County Atty., Steven R. Pfaffe, Asst. Ramsey County Atty., St. Paul, for respondent.
Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.
OPINION
GARDEBRING, Justice.
Arthur Dale Senty-Haugen appeals a decision by the trial court, affirmed by the court of appeals, holding that the statutory provisions governing commitment as a sexual psychopathic personality or sexually dangerous person…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Application of MinnegascoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Lolling v. Midwest PatrolSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Brayton v. PawlentySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. BourkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Rickert v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Erlandson v. KiffmeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.