Legal Opinion

Minnesota Voters Alliance, Relators v. Anoka-Hennepin School District, Minnesota Office of Administrative Hearings

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 27, 2015No. A14-1601PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BJORKMAN, Judge.

Relators challenge the decision of a panel of administrative-law judges dismissing their complaint against respondent school district for allegedly violating campaign-finance-reporting requirements in connection with three levy ballot questions. Re-lators argue that the panel erred by determining that respondent did not “promote” the levy ballot questions within the meaning of Minn.Stat. § 211A.01, subd. 4, and therefore was not subject to reporting requirements. We affirm. ■

FACTS

Respondent Anoka-Hennepin School District (the school district) is funded in part by levies…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  3. Citizens, & C., Public Funds v. Bd. of Educ. Tp. of Parsippany-Troy HillsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  4. Hans Hagen Homes, Inc. v. City of MinnetristaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  5. Hunter v. HartmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Op. Atty. Gen 169j, Minnesota Attorney General Reports2019
  2. Op. Atty. Gen. 169i (Cr. Ref. 169x), Minnesota Attorney General Reports2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API