Minnesota Voters Alliance, Relators v. Anoka-Hennepin School District, Minnesota Office of Administrative Hearings
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BJORKMAN, Judge.
Relators challenge the decision of a panel of administrative-law judges dismissing their complaint against respondent school district for allegedly violating campaign-finance-reporting requirements in connection with three levy ballot questions. Re-lators argue that the panel erred by determining that respondent did not “promote” the levy ballot questions within the meaning of Minn.Stat. § 211A.01, subd. 4, and therefore was not subject to reporting requirements. We affirm. ■
FACTS
Respondent Anoka-Hennepin School District (the school district) is funded in part by levies…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Citizens, & C., Public Funds v. Bd. of Educ. Tp. of Parsippany-Troy HillsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Hans Hagen Homes, Inc. v. City of MinnetristaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Hunter v. HartmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.