Hy-Vee Food Stores, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Health
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BLATZ, Chief Justice.
Respondent Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) administers the federally funded Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC). MDH disqualified appellant Hy-Vee Food Stores, Inc. as a WIC vendor for three years for violating a rule that prohibits selling tobacco products in exchange for WIC vouchers. Hy-Vee appealed, arguing that the inadvertent acceptance of a WIC voucher in payment for groceries that included one pack of cigarettes did not constitute a violation. An administrative law judge (ALJ) recommended summary disposition in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cederstrand v. Lutheran BrotherhoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Mammenga v. State Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Jasper v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Pietsch v. Minnesota Board of Chiropractic ExaminersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- SCI Minnesota Funeral Services, Inc. v. Washburn-McReavy Funeral Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- In re Pera Police & Fire Plan Line of Duty Disability Benefits of BrittainSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- In Re Consolidated Hospital Surcharge Appeals of GILLETTE CHILDREN’S SPECIALTY HEALTHCARE, St. Luke’s Hospital, North Memorial Health Care, HealthEast Care System, Park Nicollet Health Services, Fairview Health Services, and Children’s Hospitals and Clinics of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Cargill, Inc. v. Jorgenson FarmsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- In re the Consolidated Hospital Surcharge Appeals of Gillette Children's Specialty HealthcareCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.