Legal Opinion

In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Grigsby

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 16, 2009No. A07-688PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility charged respondent Stephen Vincent Grigsby with failure to file individual income tax returns, failure to report income, failure to maintain books and records, failure to use written retainer agreements, making misrepresentations to the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility, and noncooperation with the Director. The referee assigned to hear the case concluded that Grigsby violated the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct and recommended that Grigsby be suspended for 60 days. The Director appealed the referee’s…

3Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  2. In Re Discipline of BunkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against BrooksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  4. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against WestbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against De RyckeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by21 opinions

  1. In re Disciplinary Action Against ColemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against RebeauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. In re Disciplinary Action Against UlanowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against AlbrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against AitkenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API