United States v. McGowan
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
2Per curiam
We granted review to determine whether the military judge erred to appellant’s prejudice by denying his challenge of a court member for cause. The issue is raised in the following context. Trial defense counsel asked the court members during voir dire if they were “predisposed as to what type of punishment should be imposed.” Receiving an affirmative response from two of the members, he challenged them for cause, without further inquiry into the matter. The challenge was denied and defense counsel exercised his peremptory challenge as to one of the two members.
Appellant…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. DeainUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. ClevelandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
- United States v. KarnesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. FortUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
- United States v. CosgroveUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. McLarenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
- United States v. TippitUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
- United States v. JamesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
- United States v. JeffersonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. HeriotUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.