Legal Opinion

United States v. Heriot

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided October 28, 1985No. 46756; NMCM 82-4172PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

EVERETT, Chief Judge:

Appellant was tried by a special court-martial at Naval Air Station Memphis, for four alleged violations of Naval Regulations prohibiting the wrongful possession, transfer, or sale of marihuana, see Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 892. Contrary to his pleas, he was found guilty as charged and was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for 3 months, and reduction to pay grade E-l. The supervisory authority approved the findings and sentence; and the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. SmartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  2. United States v. TippitUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  3. United States v. ClevelandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
  4. United States v. McGowanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  5. United States v. TuckerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. LipsU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1986
  2. United States v. ReynoldsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  3. United States v. HamiltonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  4. United States v. JeffersonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  5. United States v. RolleCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API