Legal Opinion

Raper v. Byrum

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 22, 1965No. 32PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaKe, J.

Since the burden of proof on the issue of contributory negligence is upon the defendants, a motion for judgment of involuntary nonsuit upon that ground should be allowed only when the plaintiff’s evidence, considered alone and taken in the light most favorable to him, together with all inferences favorable to him which may reasonably be drawn therefrom, so clearly establishes the defense that no other conclusion can reasonably be drawn. Cowan v. Transfer Co., 262 N.C. 550, 138 S.E. 2d 228; Waters v. Harris, 250 N.C. 701, 110 S.E. 2d 283; Johnson v. Thompson, 250 N.C. 665, 110 S.E. 2d 306;…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Wall v. . BainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Cowan v. Murrows Transfer, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Matheny v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Badders v. LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Hawes v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Summey v. CauthenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Bowen v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. Warren v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Snider v. DickensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. Atwood Ex Rel. Hayes v. HollandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API