Snider v. Dickens
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
COPELAND, Justice.
The defendant’s principal assignment of error is the failure of the trial court to grant a directed verdict or judgment notwithstanding the verdict in his favor. The motion for jugment notwithstanding the verdict under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 50(b) is simply a motion that judgment be entered in accordance with the movant’s earlier motion for a directed verdict, notwithstanding the contrary verdict reached by the jury; therefore, we must utilize the same standard of sufficiency of the evidence in reviewing both motions. Dickinson v. Pake, 284 N.C. 576, 201 S.E. 2d 897 (1974). “In…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dickinson v. PakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Summey v. CauthenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Blalock v. HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Blalock v. HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Raper v. ByrumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Davis v. Dennis Lilly Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Potts v. BurnetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Clayton v. BransonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Brockett v. PraterWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
- Lingwall v. HoenerIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.