Legal Opinion

Snider v. Dickens

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 11, 1977No. 20PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

The defendant’s principal assignment of error is the failure of the trial court to grant a directed verdict or judgment notwithstanding the verdict in his favor. The motion for jugment notwithstanding the verdict under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 50(b) is simply a motion that judgment be entered in accordance with the movant’s earlier motion for a directed verdict, notwithstanding the contrary verdict reached by the jury; therefore, we must utilize the same standard of sufficiency of the evidence in reviewing both motions. Dickinson v. Pake, 284 N.C. 576, 201 S.E. 2d 897 (1974). “In…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. PakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Summey v. CauthenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Blalock v. HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Blalock v. HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Raper v. ByrumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Davis v. Dennis Lilly Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Potts v. BurnetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Clayton v. BransonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. Brockett v. PraterWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Lingwall v. HoenerIllinois Supreme Court · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API