Legal Opinion

Atwood Ex Rel. Hayes v. Holland

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 6, 1966No. 439PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, C.J.

Plaintiff assigns as error the entry of the judgment of compulsory nonsuit and a dismissal of the action entered at the close of plaintiff’s evidence.

Defendant states in his brief: “Assume sufficient evidence of negligence to go to the jury. What was the evidence as to contributory negligence?”

Brenda Atwood testified in her behalf in substance, except when quoted, as follows: On 9 February 1964 she was 17 years old. About 9 p.m. on Saturday, 9 February 1964, defendant driving his automobile with a man in it came to where she was living at 106 North Sunset Drive in the city of Winston-Salem,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davis Ex Rel. Allen v. RigsbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Raper v. ByrumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Samuels v. BowersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Tew v. RunnelsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. Southern National Bank of NC v. LindseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bowen v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. Goepfert v. FillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Jernigan v. ATLANTIC COASTLINE RAILROAD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  4. Peeler v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  5. Jackson v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API