Foote v. Grant
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
— The issue on this appeal is whether the driver of an automobile, who was responsible for a collision, was driving it with the permission of the owner, express or implied, at the time of the collision.
The Footes sustained injuries in consequence of the negligence of Oscar John Wernegreen who was driving a car belonging to J. F. Grant, from Chicago to Seattle. (For a more detailed statement of the facts and circumstances, see the opinion in Foote v. Grant (1960), 55 Wn. (2d) 797, 350 P. (2d) 870.) They secured default judgments against Wernegreen totalling $31,850; but the jury re*632turned a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Vezolles v. Home Indemnity Co., New YorkDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941
- Hamm v. CamerotaWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Foote v. GrantWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Wallin v. KnudtsonWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Haagen v. LandeisWashington Supreme Court · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Walker v. Pacific Mobile Homes, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1966
- Royal Indemnity Company v. PearsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
- Aldcroft v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
- Moritz v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. RagatzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.