Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Ragatz

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1997No. NonePublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Farm & City Insurance Co. (Farm & City) appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. (State Farm) and denial of summary judgment to Farm & City. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

[¶ 2.] At the time this controversy arose, David McGaugh (David) had an automobile insurance policy issued by State Farm which covered his 1976 Chevrolet pickup. In mid-December, 1994, David gave permission to his adult son, Carl McGaugh (Carl), to use the pickup because Carl’s vehicle had broken down. A few days later, David’s pickup was…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Garrett v. BankWest, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Konrad v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1956
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. VostadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Cimarron Insurance Co. v. CroyleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Royal Indemnity Company v. Henry Clingan and Linda ClinganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wulf v. SenstSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Progressive Northern Insurance v. Concord General Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  3. Estate of Trobaugh Ex Rel. Trobaugh v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. O'Neal v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  5. Estate of Trobaugh Ex Rel. Trobaugh v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API