State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Ragatz
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERTSON, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Farm & City Insurance Co. (Farm & City) appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. (State Farm) and denial of summary judgment to Farm & City. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
[¶ 2.] At the time this controversy arose, David McGaugh (David) had an automobile insurance policy issued by State Farm which covered his 1976 Chevrolet pickup. In mid-December, 1994, David gave permission to his adult son, Carl McGaugh (Carl), to use the pickup because Carl’s vehicle had broken down. A few days later, David’s pickup was…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Garrett v. BankWest, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Konrad v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1956
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. VostadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Cimarron Insurance Co. v. CroyleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Royal Indemnity Company v. Henry Clingan and Linda ClinganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wulf v. SenstSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Progressive Northern Insurance v. Concord General Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Estate of Trobaugh Ex Rel. Trobaugh v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- O'Neal v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
- Estate of Trobaugh Ex Rel. Trobaugh v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.