Hamm v. Camerota

The principal issue on this appeal is whether Larry Sisson, against whom respondents recovered a judgment in a tort action, was, at-the time of the automobile accident which gave rise to that action, an “insured” under a certain policy of liability insurance (called a national standard policy) issued by appellant to John Camerota, Sr.

In the tort action, respondents (plaintiffs therein), by their amended complaint, joined as defendants Larry Sis-son, John Camerota, Sr., and his wife, and John Camerota, Jr. In this complaint, it was alleged that the three Camerotas owned the car involved in the…