Legal Opinion

Haagen v. Landeis

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1960No. 34730, 34731PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOtt, J.

— The defendants signed contracts for advertising space with National Business & Property Exchange, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the corporation), and, after the advertisements had been published, refused to pay for them. These actions to recover the contract price were brought by the successors of the corporation. The trial court found that the contracts had been procured by fraud and entered judgments for the defendants. The plaintiffs appeal.

The cases were consolidated on appeal. The Landeis case only will be discussed herein and, because the questions presented are identical, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bowles Co. v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Kelley v. Von HerbergWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Graff v. GeiselWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Gray v. Wikstrom Motors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Codd v. New York Underwriters InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Michielli v. U. S. Mortgage Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Foote v. GrantWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. State v. CookeWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Coson v. RoehlWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Household Finance Corp. v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API