Legal Opinion
Royal Indemnity Company v. Pearson
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 25, 1971No. 1 Div. 540PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAWSON, Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in a garnishment proceeding. — § 1029, Title 7, Code 1940.
Lavetta Pearson sustained personal injuries when an automobile she was operating collided with a truck being driven by one Cleveland Moorer.
Subsequently a suit was filed by Lavetta Pearson to recover damages for the injuries she alleged she sustained in the accident. Named as defendants in that suit were The Merchants National Bank of Mobile, hereinafter referred to as the Bank; S. M. Adams, Inc., a corporation, hereinafter referred to as the Adams Company; Roche L. Smith and…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- MacClure v. Accident & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Mitchell v. KinneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Jameson v. Farmers Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- National Surety Corporation v. L. E. Wells, Sr. v. R. Hopfe, and Ella Hopfe, and L. E. Wells, Jr., a MinorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- MacEy v. CrumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Billups v. Ala. Farm Bur. Mut. Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- City of Northglenn v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1986
- Joe Fleming v. Pan American Fire & Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Murphree v. HensonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- Midwest Emp. Cas. v. E. Ala. Health CareSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.