Legal Opinion
Alvernaz v. H. P. Garin Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 26, 1932No. Docket No. 8381PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The above action was brought to recover for the alleged breach of a contract to purchase all the green and ripe tomatoes grown by plaintiff on 30 acres of land.
The plaintiff was referred to in the contract as the grower, and defendant corporation as the buyer and shipper.
The action was tried before a jury, which returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $1600.50, and defendant has appealed from the judgment entered thereon. As grounds therefor it is claimed that there was no evidenec of a breach of contract and that the verdict for damages is unsupported. Appellant also…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McConnell v. Corona City Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Carlson v. LantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Sobelman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Holt Manufacturing Co. v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Kullman, Salz & Co. v. Sugar Apparatus Mfg. Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ball v. Stokely Foods, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1950
- Ice Bowl, Inc. v. Spalding Sales Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1943
- Barrios v. IwakiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Yeremian v. Turlock Dehydrating & Packing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- Carpenter Steel Co. v. PellegrinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.