Legal Opinion

Barrios v. Iwaki

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 17, 1939No. Civ. 12136PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrail, P. J.

The plaintiff: on appeal contends that the trial court erred in failing to make a finding with regard to “an implied warranty of merchantability”, and the sole question necessary for this court to determine is, was it necessary for the trial court to make such a finding %

Plaintiff’s cause of action is based on two counts. In the first count the plaintiff alleges that in the sale of a certain medicine for hair dyeing purposes called “Two-Paces”, the defendant warranted “that each and all of the ingredients in said preparation were absolutely safe and harmless; that said preparation could be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kullman, Salz & Co. v. Sugar Apparatus Mfg. Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  2. American Steel Pipe & Tank Co. v. HubbardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. Alvernaz v. H. P. Garin Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ice Bowl, Inc. v. Spalding Sales Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. Wilson v. RayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Martin v. AuerbachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. State v. RiggleWyoming Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API