Barrios v. Iwaki
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCrail, P. J.
The plaintiff: on appeal contends that the trial court erred in failing to make a finding with regard to “an implied warranty of merchantability”, and the sole question necessary for this court to determine is, was it necessary for the trial court to make such a finding %
Plaintiff’s cause of action is based on two counts. In the first count the plaintiff alleges that in the sale of a certain medicine for hair dyeing purposes called “Two-Paces”, the defendant warranted “that each and all of the ingredients in said preparation were absolutely safe and harmless; that said preparation could be…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kullman, Salz & Co. v. Sugar Apparatus Mfg. Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- American Steel Pipe & Tank Co. v. HubbardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Alvernaz v. H. P. Garin Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ice Bowl, Inc. v. Spalding Sales Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1943
- Wilson v. RayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Martin v. AuerbachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- State v. RiggleWyoming Supreme Court · 1956