Legal Opinion

Ice Bowl, Inc. v. Spalding Sales Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 30, 1943No. Civ. 12200PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

The plaintiff and cross-defendant, Ice Bowl, Inc., appeals from a judgment in favor of the defendant and cross-complainant, Spalding Sales Corporation, in an action involving the purchase by appellant from the respondent of 593 pairs of ice skates and shoe combinations at an agreed price of $3.95 a pair. Appellant’s action was for damages for breach of warranty, and respondent’s cross-complaint was for the recovery of the purchase price of the property sold and delivered. The cause was tried before the court sitting without a jury, and the court found generally against appellant and in favor…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kullman, Salz & Co. v. Sugar Apparatus Mfg. Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Alvernaz v. H. P. Garin Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Barrios v. IwakiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fieldstone Co. v. Briggs Plumbing Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Vallis v. Canada Dry Ginger Ale, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Reininger v. Eldon Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. In re Trader Joe's Tuna Litig.District Court, C.D. California · 2017
  5. Wilson v. RayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API